1. We have categorized more than 80 thousand repair manuals and service manuals taken from manufacturers' official websites. User service guides, diagrams, schematics and circuit diagrams, replacement hardware lists and catalogues, flowcharts and other repair manuals for ASUS, Samsung, Canon, Dell, HP and other world brands.
2. User Manuals for all Camera & Camcorder products. Get a Printed and bound manual shipped to your door with quick shipping. Instant download of your user guide. Canon Casio Contarex Contax Curtis DigitalConcepts DXG: Ematic Fujifilm GE GoPro Hasselblad Hitachi HP Insignia JVC Kodak Konica.

1. Cannon Technologies Lcr 5000 Manual
2. Cannon Technologies Lcr 5000 Manual Canons
3. Cannon Technologies Lcr 5000 Manual Canon City

The Canon EOS Rebel T7i / 800D is the latest incarnation of Canon's hugely popular mass-market range of DSLRs. This latest model is built around a 24MP sensor that uses Canon's Dual Pixel AF system to offer improved autofocus in live view and video (more on that later). At its core, it shares a lot with the more expensive EOS 77D but the differences become apparent when you first turn them on: both models feature a simplified 'skin' over the user interface, but only the T7i has these guiding functions switched on by default. Key Features. 24MP APS-C sensor with Dual Pixel design. 45 AF points, all of which are horizontally and vertically sensitive. Built-in Wi-Fi with Bluetooth and NFC.

The Cannon Technologies LCR-5200 load control switches used in this program have been purchased from. Using a unique ID number for each device, tracks its location at all times: in the warehouse, on a vehicle waiting for installation, or installed in the field.

1080p video at up to 60 fps with electronic IS. Fully articulated 1.04M-dot rear LCD This should make immediately apparent who Canon is targeting with this camera: casual and family photographers buying their first DSLR and people who want to learn a little more about photography. It's these two audiences we'll focus on in this review. The rivals The Canon Rebel series (as it's known in North America) is the best-selling series of DSLRs in the World, but it's not without its rivals. A couple of these stand out, to us.

Nikon's D5600 is another 24MP camera that aims to offer a lot of capability in a relatively straightforward way. Sony, meanwhile, offers two mirrorless cameras to target these users: the a5100 is a simpler, more point-and-shoot orientated camera while the a6000 has a little more of its raw power on display, for those who have the time to learn how to use it. Fujifilm again focuses on the photographer looking for a camera to grow into with its X-T20. Similarly, the Panasonic G85/G80 gives room to expand into, especially given its mix of touchscreen and button control and its 4K video capability.

Canon T7i Fujifilm X-T20 Nikon D5600 Panasonic G85 Sony a6000 Price (MSRP, w/kit lens) $899 $999 $799 $999 $698 Sensor 24MP APS-C 24MP APS-C 24MP APS-C 16MP FourThirds 24MP APS-C Image stab. Our only real concern for beginner users is that, because viewfinder and live view operation have historically been totally different, it ends up being possible to set them to behave differently, in terms of autofocus. Particularly for beginners, we'd like focus drive mode and focus area mode to honor the same settings across both methods of shooting.

Sadly, this simplicity doesn't extend to the operation of the camera's Wi-Fi system. There's little point having a better quality camera if your images remain landlocked on the memory card while everyone around you posts their phone images to social media or sends copies to other family members. We found the T7i is a little complex to connect to a smartphone, which may hinder some users. The canon t series is by far in my opinion one of the best lineup of cameras for a beginner in the world of the dslr, after owning a t7i for over 1 year after its release and 20,000 clicks later on the body I can confidently say that for the price it is astonishing what its capable of in terms of quality and versatility throughout the software as well as the hardware. Would 100% recommend for anyone at the entry level stage of photography looking for a quality dslr for a reasonable price!!! Will leave link below as to where I purchased mine! Typically, you would want to spend a little less on the camera body so you can invest in lenses, which will last much longer than a camera body.

I would suggest the Canon SL2 (200D) as it is compact and lightweight with excellent features and an articulating screen. Get the kit lens with it, and look into the 24mm f/2.8 STM pancake lens (for ultimate portability), as well the 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 STM (if you are interested in ultra-wide angles), and the 55-250mm STM for telephoto. Nikon D3400 is another good choice, though without the articulating touchscreen, and a slightly lower-powered flash.

There is no WiFi, but it uses Bluetooth instead with an app. If interested in this camera, I would recommend the kit lens, and 35mm f/1.8 G DX (for low-light), and 55-200mm VR II (the retractable locking version). Nikon also has a new budget ultra-wide, 10-20mm DX, if you're interested.

Again, for first DSLR, it is recommended to invest more money into lenses. Either option should work well. Just a quick comment to say that, even at the entry level of dSLRs, I like and read every word of DPR's usual 'long form' reviews and was disappointed to see this one not get the same attention traditionally given to models in its class. A C$1k camera is NOT a trivial purchase for someone like me. In particular I was hoping you would expound more on whether or by how much this model is improved in the dynamic range department. DPR's critique of the t5i in this respect (lagging behind its peers from Nikon etc) is what steered me away from that model.

It would be great to know if Canon's tXi series is catching up or not. I guess there is a fair balance of DSLR and Mirrorless reviews on this site that may assist beginning photographers with a choice. I think most buyers are also more astute than to make a purchase on the basis there is a propriety lens collection, clearly they also buy for mirrorless cameras with smaller lens collections, some of which are as heavy as DSLR lenses, and don't appear to mind luging them around either. Then again we all have personal biases that are not necessarily helpful to beginning photographers either.

EF mount is indeed 'proprietary' in the sense that Canon doesn't tell anyone the specs, but they are less 'proprietary' than any mirrorless mount in terms of actual versatility: they can be used via adapters on other platforms (one of which is fully supported by Canon itself). The lenses are thus pretty much guaranteed to remain useful for a long time, even if DSLRs do go the way of dinosaurs as you believe. In contrast, with mirrorless you get to bet on one of several mutually incompatible mounts (E, Leica SL, Leica T, X, NX, EF-M, m4/3, Nikon 1), with no prospects for salvaging your investment if the mount dies. Scaremongering, you say? Go ask on the Samsung forum how non-'proprietary' their lens collection turned out to be. While I said mirrorless in general as the way for beginners to go, if I was to really express my 'personal biases' or 'considered opinions' (depending on how one looks at it), I would suggest Micro 4/3rds to beginniners as a system to build on. Micro 4/3rds has smaller and lighter lenses, especially telephoto lenses, that make camera bodies about half the weight and size of APS-C and 35mm sized kits.

Cannon Technologies Lcr 5000 Manual

Drawing on more than one manufacturer, there are more than enough available lenses in the system- about sixty different ones as I recall. I agree micro 4/3 is a good option, as are most mirrorless systems.

However I do struggle with the suggestion that DSLRs have been superceded by mirrorless cameras. I use both and I really do not mind the weight of my DSLRs. I can and do lug them for miles. I guess I am comfortable with what goes with my choices both good and bad.

The problem with these debates is that they tend to assume that we see things the same way and therefore bigger or more heavy = bad. In truth the good and bad of a system does not attach to the equipment, it is a function of our values, preferences and choices we make. Dinosaurs were amongst the most successful creatures that ever lived, and covered a period far greater than man. The dinosaurs might have died off but primitive and unimaginative thinking appears to have lived on. Any one with any understanding of photography will appreciate a camera is just a tool to get the job done and a mix of DSLR and mirrorless cameras remains valid. Too many read other comments and accept them uncritically as facts.

Not having an open mind Is more likely to make some one extinct as a photographer then the camera they hold. All reviews are opinions, pretty much by definition. Our awards are based on the lead reviewer's considered opinion of how good the camera is for its target audience. If you choose to dismiss that as 'feelings' you're welcome to, but the reviewer has to justify their decision to the rest of the group, so it's not a case that reviewer X was in a good mood that day, but reviewer Y is a right sulky one. The T7i is the DSLR offering the most consistent OVF/Live View experience I've seen and that's augmented by one of the smartest guide modes I've ever used (in that it forces you to use the camera the way it'll work once you turn guide mode off, rather than leaving you stuck there forever). Again, you can choose to characterise this as 'bringing nothing new' because you've only looked at the shape of the camera and the basic specs, but having spent a month shooting with it, I was surprised how much better it is than the comparable DSLRs I've used before. @kubekube I am not sure why you equate technical characteristics with difficulty of use.

What makes a camera, or for that matter any device, easy or hard to use is NOT the technical specification, it's the USER INTERFACE. In that respect this camera offers new levels of user-friendly controls and guidance. The number of megapixels should offer better quality without making taking a photo any harder. The autofocus points can blend seamlessly into the automatic functions to make the process of assessing exposure easier. As far as the BT and NFC, most users of smartphones or computers will be familiar this these features already, and they are optional. A lot of casual users want a camera that is a versatile tool for both video and still photography.

Again the quality of the image is irrelevant to the difficulty of using the controls. A fully articulated screen is a pretty simple device - I have no idea why this would baffle someone familiar with a door or a flip phone. I am making this comment as a potential buyer. I have no camera experience and I am thinking of moving away from just relying on a smart phone to some thing like this.

I like the fact that, while I may know the science behind the optics, informative menus can really help. Its touch screen and that is a plus. As another commentator mentioned this camera is like a good place to transition from a smart phone to. I am not talking about been a power user, but out of the box UX seems great. Also judging by the samples provided, I am more confident this might be a good place to start. My only worry is, is the non live view auto focus as good as the duel-pixel auto focus? Thanks for the detailed article.

I almost always use my viewfinder for pictures, the dedicated phase detect sensors are just way faster and way more precise in low light than live view (the back-screen), even than DPAF. DPAF is AMAZING.but if I'm shooting fast moving subjects I much prefer the viewfinder still, it's just faster. Also, during heavy sunlight, you really want to be using the viewfinder instaed of the back screen since heavy sunlight blacks out the screen like on a smartphone. There are times I use live view for pics though, like if you're in a store and need to take pics of objects, you just want to swing your camera around and take shots like a smartphone, just looking at the screen, you're just casually snapping off pics. During video you can't use the viewfinder, so you're forced to use the backscreen to do everything. (the mirror is permanently flipped up during video).

I wonder why Canon thinks wi-fi and all that instant sharing junk is needed? If you want all that stick with your smart-phone! I feel a bit old fashioned perhaps but half the fun of photography is in the darkroom/Lightroom where you can tinker if the camera does not completely share your intensions when you release the shutter.

Camera mfgrs should focus more with improving their focusing capabilities, lens perfection (like getting the Fs down-as well as the ISOs). Getting the weight factor down a bit on the longer lenses would be nice too. Improvements like better weather proofing should come WAY before wi-fi and other such foolishness!! OK, so much for a photographer who's cell phone is a tool not an appendage!

I used to use DEP in a Canon film SLR. It worked really well for me. Back then, you set the camera to DEP mode (it wasn't called A-DEP back then), focused on the near point you wanted sharp (with a half-press of the shutter button), then focused on the far point you wanted sharp (with a half-press of the shutter button), and when you half-pressed the shutter button again the camera would automatically set lens focus position and exposure settings to achieve that particular near-far depth of field. I think in subsequent versions of DEP (it become A-DEP), they dumbed it down so that you couldn't designate near-far focus points manually. It all happened automatically, based on what all the focus points saw in the scene.

You cannot possibly achieve low noise at high ISO with a 15-year-old camera. Take the 10D out for a swing at ISO1600 and tell me that's remotely comparably to what a 5D4 does. Use DPR's own comparison tools to see for yourself.

As for the FPS thing, you're just dodging your own issue. You said things have not changed, and I point out that cameras can now shoot much faster, and you resort to saying 'but that's not very useful.' Please help yourself untangle this mess.

But like I said, go ahead and shoot with a 15-year-old camera and decide if you can live with it. If so, then you're either very forgiving or your skill level is lightyears ahead of me.

This is the 7D vs 5D4 (the 10-40D's aren't even listed anymore). The noise difference is tremendous. And the 7D is not yet 15 years old. So please stop with the nonsense that 'noise is just the same.' 'The ability to wring a dial to extreme levels of ISO does not make those images worthy.' Once again you're just turning the conversation in a different direction to benefit your argument.

If you can't keep a straight conversation, don't start one. DSLRs have changed tremendously in the past 15 years, admit it. For a start - dpreviews studio tests are not NASA expeditions and there's no reason to treat them as holy: long rummaging would give some examples after lots of searching - but generally differences are not very noticeable.In the above example I attribute the differences more to in-built noise suppression software and less to an advance in technology.The canon 5d is 5 times more expensive than a conventional dslr, much heavier, hence supplied with much more powerful processors and an ability to immediate post-processing. Someone has to inform the guys at canon about the current abilities of iphones and galaxies.They seem to ignore the era they live in. With some L-glass or a 50mm 1.4. In photos, there is absolutely nothing I would do better with this camera, than with my Canon 500D(great camera BTW).

With some skill, good glass and lightroom the end result would basically the same. You start with the Canon 1200D, the upgrade to the 800D, then to the 80D, then the 5d iv. Is that Canon plan? Wait, throw in the 77D. Please, please do yourself a favor save some money and buy a used full frame, save some money and buy better glass, try other brands, skip this one. You will thank me later. Not looking at DPR samples, or any other online posts.

Based on my experience with the early Rebel camera from 2006 (barely 10 years old, nowhere near 15) and last year's D7200, I see a big improvement. My older camera produces barely acceptable results at ISO 800, which is comparable to around ISO 3200 on the D7200 (sometimes higher). I would say that my D7100 was just as good as this D7200 if not better. So, from my point of view, there has been a big jump in the last 5 to 7 years in sensor technology. The RAW files from today's cameras have far more detail than the older cameras did. DPR headlines this camera as a 'Beginner Friendly'. I have a problem with it and I guess I'm not the only one.24MP APS-C sensor with Dual Pixel design - beginner?.45 AF points, all of which are horizontally and vertically sensitive - beginner?.Built-in Wi-Fi with Bluetooth and NFC - beginner?.1080p video at up to 60 fps with electronic IS - beginner?.Fully articulated 1.04M-dot rear LCD - beginner?

These alone would send this camera into the science fiction category just a decade ago. Wouldn't it be fair to acknowledge that even the basic modern digital cameras are already so advanced that calling them 'beginner friendly' is a nonsense or it is just playing a hand into the marketing ploys of their manufacturers? A capable user would be able to produce with this camera images whose quality will far surpass the highest end DSLR cameras a decade ago or a movie which with proper editing would be able to stand against the best technically speaking in any film festival. First of all, you don't seem to understand what 'Beginner Friendly' means.

It does NOT mean 'Advanced Photographer Unfriendly.' It simply means that it has some features and designs that make it more accessible to newer users. Secondly, do you realize how long 'just a decade ago' is?

'Just a decade ago', the iPhone was just being introduced and most of us had never used a smartphone before. My point is that you're not supposed to compare any product against some product from 'a decade ago'. You're supposed to compare it against what is currently in the market. That's what people do, and it's a perfectly reasonable thing to do. @kubekube I am not sure why you equate technical characteristics with difficulty of use. What makes a camera, or for that matter any device, easy or hard to use is NOT the technical specification, it's the USER INTERFACE.

In that respect this camera offers new levels of user-friendly controls and guidance. The number of megapixels should offer better quality without making taking a photo any harder. The autofocus points can blend seamlessly into the automatic functions to make the process of assessing exposure easier.

As far as the BT and NFC, most users of smartphones or computers will be familiar this these features already, and they are optional. A lot of casual users want a camera that is a versatile tool for both video and still photography. Again the quality of the image is irrelevant to the difficulty of using the controls. A fully articulated screen is a pretty simple device - I have no idea why this would baffle someone familiar with a door or a flip phone. Thanks Richard.

Appears we disagree on intended audience and their need to more quickly post to social media. Maybe you have it correct that it's a big factor for some. In talking to family members who use their smartphones for images, I encourage them to try a dslr for general photography. The feedback is that in any situation, the dslr wins big time, not only for reach, but for indoors and movement. My solution: carry both! Thanks for the well rounded review and glad to see these camera companies continuing to raise the bar with excellent products. The lack of MFA is a serious omission.

I know it's a Rebel but MFA is more important for accuracy and fixable focusing than some other features. I have owned several Rebel models over the years, but no long would buy one for this reason. The choice is either a much heavier and larger camera, like the 70D I bought or switch to mirrorless. Live view is great, but I don't buy an OVF camera to frequently use a screen. When the M5 or successor drops in price to something more competitive with other moderately advanced mirrorless cameras, that's where I will be heading because I have too much invested in lenses, flashes, etc. Shops can do accurate MFA for old ladies with a 1st dslr, etc. MFA capabilith should be in every camera.

It makes no sense. They put it in all the mid range and upper range cameras, which means they acknowledge that lens/cameras can be a little bit oof.

Then they make cameras that you cant fix it in? When I had my 1st dslr (t2i) and used my 50mm 1.8, it was maddening.

Same issue with the lens when I got my 70d, but was finally able to adjust for it. Disnt know to celebrate or be resentful for the years of torture. Roland Karlsson - you may expect to, and be willing to, use this camera in line with your preconceptions of how an SLR should be used, but there's no reason that should be true for everyone. I've seen enough first-time DSLR buyers battle against live view because that's how they expect a camera to work, that a DSLR with near-seamless performance LV/OVF performance is a big deal. And yes, given the T7i works better in live view than through the viewfinder, it does raise questions about the benefits over mirrorless cameras. Richard - a good analysis.

An SLR where the LV is better than the OVF is a kind of strange beast. And, of course, anyone can use it any way they want.

I use LV a lot on my K-1. Every time when exact focus is a must, and also when I take photos over the crowd, looking at the LCD. And I still maintain that LV on SLR cameras is kind of awkward. Maybe that is not so for the T7i, but I am skeptical. Maybe you can configure it to start in LV.

So that you can start the camera and take an image in a second or two. Like a mirrorless. Roland, I'm in agreement that when using an SLR I'm more likely to use the OVF than the EVF (unless I'm shooting video). However, the last couple years I've noticed quite a few SLR shooters that always seem to shoot in live view - particularly younger photographers. It kind of makes sense. To a certain generation, using the rear screen is the only way they've ever known to take photos, so it's natural that some will extend this behavior a DSLR as well. In that context, I think Canon identified a great opportunity.

Create a DSLR with a very friendly touchscreen interface, and it will appeal the smartphone generation - even the ones that want to use a DSLR. @Butler - yeah, I know. That is the nature of your gold awards. It has no formal definition. It is a reviewers privilege to set it on any criteria he/she finds suitable. So, this is a mass market SLR Canon camera very suitable for someone searching for a mass market SLR Canon camera. Ill buy that this is a plus, if it is true.

A Pentax K-70 is a bit less expensive though. Maybe that is a very suitable camera for someone searching for a K-70. What do you think? Is that true?

In that case, this is a gold award camera also. Awards and scores are not directly linked, otherwise the award would simply be the score, restated to a lower degree of precision.

For a first time DSLR buyer, this camera is easier to use than a K-70, it's also unusual in the degree to which it supports the learning process. Its autofocus is genuinely excellent and it's the one of the easiest cameras to shoot video with on the market. For anyone walking into a big box store, these are all hugely valuable. The K-70 is a very good camera, that's why it scores so well and that's why it got a Silver award. However, without the ease-of-use, it's competing for a rather different audience - one that already knows how a DSLR-style works. That means it has to compete with the likes of the D5600 and the Fujifilm X-T20 (and I'd recommend any of those three, depending on the user's exact needs).

DrJon identified one of the important factors. While some of us camera nerds read every page of every review, that's not true for all people, especially when it comes to entry level cameras.

On a camera like the D500 or 1D X II an in-depth, technical review make a lot of sense. People researching those cameras absolutely care about the details and read everything. On the other hand, a lot of people researching entry level cameras don't care about that level of detail. We're experimenting with a slightly different format that may be more accessible to this camera's audience. We'll watch to see how it does.

(It also frees up some of our time to write more reviews, or more detailed reviews of cameras where the details really matter.). This is what I do not really understand. This review is brief because its supposedly 'my first camera'.

But it is quite unlikely to be someone's first step into ILC, at least for years to come until the price has dropped enough. To put it into perspective; the 800D is 869 euros where I'm at. There are plenty of other Canon offerings which are more attractive because they are significantly cheaper: Still on sale as of this day are the 1200D (€265), the 1300D (€333), the 100D(€265), the 700D (€382), the 750D (€549), and the 760D (€629).

So, unless I am mistaken and there is a niche for relatively expensive 'my-first-cameras', the 800D is not going to appeal as a first-ever DSLR. That's an interesting point, and I was considering amending my comment to mention that for some people with limited funds this might be as far as they can reach and they would actually be interested in a more technical review. However I still think a lot of purchasers will be people new to ILCs and not particularly photo-savvy, but with a better budget than many, perhaps due to not being teenagers but feeling they have stuff in their lives they want better quality photographs of. Examples - having a baby, eBay selling, getting married, exotic vacations, etc. But, in the event that there are those who would be willing to pay more for the 800D's extra features, there comes an even bigger problem. The 77D is €919 euros instead of the €869 for the 800D. This mere 50 euro premium gives you a fair bit more features for that money.

So, the 800D is too expensive as a 'my-first-camera' compared to the older offerings, but it is also overshadowed by the slightly more expensive 77D. This begs the question, why would someone be compelled to buy the 800D at all?

It makes no sense. This review should have treated this question. But because it is so short, it doesn't. There is no justification for the 800D's price being so close to the 77D. When they are compared, the 77D is simply referred to as 'more expensive', and it mentions some of the features it has added over the 800D. This is why a proper review would have been nicer, or at least an honest one that said; 'What the hell is Canon's marketing strategy with the 800D?' I don't agree with these toned down reviews either.it's pretty disappointing considering the audience has wanted MORE reviews for some time now.

You guys have quite obviously been overwhelmed with camera reviews for a few years now.we get it. And if the stats are saying no one's reading most of the review, then hey, I guess we all lose. But this format of a 'mild' review I don't think helps. XSI was my first canon body. It took me 6 months to wrap my head around the how, what and especially why. I re-read the same data again and again, tested, then read more. These newer cameras can do a LOT more, especially in the video department, and I still haven't really figured out servo and tracking proper.

I think a better approach is to just mimic existing data for areas that haven't changed model to model- ala TDP. Less effort for you guys but hte data still gets in there for those who need it.

PS - Please hire a sole camera reviewer. Even canon rumors has one for lenses.:(. Here's the thing, most of the people that will be buying this camera are fine with 1080p. Sure they can appreciate 4k and may even shoot it on their phones or GoPros but the majority of people in the segments most likely to purchase this camera don't own 4K displays/TVs or computers that can easily edit 4K footage. In fact most people will be buying this as a stills camera first and foremost. Canon may lose more of its amateur film maker and vloggers to but that audience is a lot smaller than the typical audience who buys rebels. @The Squire Canon bother's to give them 24MP stills for several reasons.

First off megapixels still sell cameras in this segment in the sense that not matching your competition is viewed as a negative. Consumers in this segment also expect their 'good' camera to have more megapixels than their phones which typically range from 8-16MPs. Canon's 24 megapixel APS-C chip is now their defacto sensor. They make a ton of them, which helps drive the manufacturing costs down, and they put them in as many cameras including this one. When it comes to handling 24MP images remember that most people in this segment shoot JPEG. Even at 24MP a JPEG isn't too demanding on your typical computer.

Heck, if even those that do shoot RAW will find editing a 24MP RAW files to be far less taxing than 4K footage. Ok, I should have said 'high end' models instead of 'pro' models when I was thinking of the likes of GH5, A9 and E-M1 Mark II. We know all too well that more than 90% of the people who use these do not work with cameras for a living.

Each pro has a specialty and wants the most specific camera possible but unfortunately the market can only support general-purpose do-it-all cameras. Let's not forget each pro is just one of the many specialties and each pro benefits from the economy of scale of these general-purpose machines. This review ties perfectly with the brouhaha on the A9 previews, opinions or whatever you gonna call it. Boring, unnecessary updates from the major manufacturers result in apathy from reviewers like this.

Who really cares for this model? It is not a A vs B. It is about bringing innovation and new features to us. Compare this review with the 5DS R.

Even with poor DR that was an exciting development and there was lots of positive engagement here. This camera is the reason people are so excited about the Sony A9, Fuji MF, A7rII. This brings nothing to the table.

@TORN You are right that the cost is the biggest differentiator here but if we go by your definition the majority of the camera users are cell phone users and they could care less for a 700$ camera. Specially one as forgettable as this. @ozturert I guess you missed my point: in this site people are looking for innovation/new features/etc.

In the already saturated market of a 700$ this camera is just another one among many which fails to entice because there is nothing eye catching. You can try to trivialize my argument, beat it to death and then come out with a one-liner to try to dismiss it. Still doesn't change the fact that this is a boring update that will not get anyone talking about it. It sounds and feels like I am harping in this product, I am not.

I am just wondering who will actually buy this? Those who are interested in photography most likely will go a tier higher. And this camera for sure won't convert anyone from the cell phone camp.

I am usually one of the first to criticize canon for total lack of progress. But that just isn't the case this time arround.

Over it's predecessor. It significantly closes the gap to it's peers in image quality by using on sensor ADC's. (80d sensor) - it increases the focus points more then 2-fold(Also borrowed from the 80d) - good live view AF due to dual pixel AF.

adds stupid marketing in body digital IS no one gives a crap about. Still the first 3 are solid additions which make this the first Rebel overall better then the compareable Nikon since the T2i - D5000. So kudo's to them and a award well deserved. This will actually help users getting into photography and video graphy. But damn the T6 is now so far behind that it looks vintage. Several key questions to DPR sorry for the invonvenience. 1- The feature that makes me consider this model is simply being able to shoot steady handheld video takes when using manual/prime glass.

While probably an add-on spec added at final production line, it's the most exciting for me! I suspect the electronic algorithm is NOT going anywhere near mechanical sensor motion but the question is, how far is it? Friends are reporting IBIS like performance but I simply discarded that thought. Does it work in a pinch? And can you put more specific numbers on any crop or IQ loss? (more aliasing? Softness?) Etc.

2- The biggest issue with Canon APS-C DSLRs (short of the 7DII) is the EXTREMELY apparent, dancing colour moire and aliaaing on ANY structure with repeated pattern. You can't shoot a street as the asphalt will shimmer and buildings will dance with colour rainbows! Nikon hasn't had that issue since the D5200 onward and D3300 onwards (of course no camera is immune to aliasing on a chart but I am talking real world shooting here).Can you give me an answer to these two questions as my purchase will depend on them. Thanks a lot for the hard work DPR team. (Hey I like the older, longer, more objective, data-filled review format.). The Rebel series used to differentiate itself from the 'upper tier' xxD cameras with lower specs, price and size. Now that a hybrid like the 77D exists, which has basically the specs of the 80D in a Rebel-sized body and at at price that is not much higher than a Rebel, does the 800D still make sense in Canon's lineup?

I mean, the last generation of Rebels (750/760D) was clearly aimed at a different market than the 80D, both for specs, price and size. But I don't really see any major selling point that could make me think:'Oh yeah the 800D is clearly aimed at customers X while the 77D is aimed at Y'. For a relatively small price difference, the 77D seems to just bring a lot more on the table than the 800D, without the extra weight and bulk of an 80D. The extra 150$ seem well worth it for me. Dual-pixel is so awesome. In mirrorless mode(liveview). Completely useless in traditional viewing mode.

But in that mode, regular PDAF will kick in. Best of both worlds? I can imagine future 1 D series announcement. 20fps12 1only available in LV 2AF in dual-pixel only But how good dual-pixel in tracking?? The camera can track subjects around the frame as well (if not better). So there we go gentlemen, mirrorless tech indeed is the future.even if it is in DSLR form.

Yes people forget that once you move that mirror-up (live-view) you're essentially in mirrorless shooting mode so a refined liveview experience in a DSLR is a very exciting package that's never been available. Compared to dedicated mirrorless designs you lose having the EVF of course, and the longer flange distance will give fewer adapting options. But with a DSLR, you get a true OVF for shooting stills, enormously better battery life and the lens line up. No not best of both world anyway (unless they make a hotshoe EVF.

) both still have a specigication/ability gap, but I am glad it's shrinking and they're getting closer to one another borrowing the good features of the compititor. De tested the new 18-135 and their conclusion was clear.

Get the older 18-135mm IS STM! Which is excellent. As for other brands. Nikon has the 18-140mm VR which is compareable. Fuji also has the 18-135 which is arguably the best in class.

Weathersealed too. But very expensive. Pentax has one too but don't bother. That one is garbage. Way too soft in the corners.

Sony has a 18-105mm F4 for their mirrorless. Which is one of their few good zooms for Apsc. Panasonic has an 14-140mm which is very well regarded. With a Gx80 it would be a MUCH smaller package that can shoot 4k. So that might compliment your existing gear better.

Cannon Technologies Lcr 5000 Manual Canons

Then another option would be an travel compact. In that case there can be only 1 recommendation. The Panasonic TZ100. 24-240mm equiv. And a decent 1 inch sensor.

The Pinnacle of PowerShot Bright, fast and more creative than ever: advanced technologies come together for an exciting new camera that moves beyond anything the G-Series has seen before. The PowerShot G1 X digital camera will inspire advanced amateurs who have embraced the G-Series to explore new realms of photographic expression, and give pros an excellent camera that complements their creative demands.

Cannon Technologies Lcr 5000 Manual Canon City

The new 1.5-inch High-Sensitivity CMOS sensor approaches DSLR size, with a light-sensitive area that's approximately 6.3 times larger than that of the PowerShot G12 digital camera. The new 14.3 Megapixel sensor, combined with a new lens and DIGIC 5 Image Processor, creates the HS SYSTEM that delivers image quality previously impossible in a compact camera, with beautiful blur, lower noise, and extraordinary resolution in low-light shooting and can shoot at ISOs of up to 12800. The PowerShot G1 X also has 14-bit RAW capabilities for even greater creative control and Full HD Video recording.

Manual settings and operability inherited from EOS cameras impart a high-level shooting experience, and open the door to new creative possibilities. Substantive luxury defines the design: a neatly clarified sculpture with a firm grip, huge Vari-angle LCD and optical viewfinder. Canon DIGIC 5 Image Processor The latest-generation Canon DIGIC 5 Image Processor brings phenomenal increases in processing speed and power. Enhancements include improved chip architecture and algorithms, improved noise reduction and enhanced i-Contrast performance. The faster processing speed also results in faster continuous shooting capability.

The DIGIC 5 Image Processor also makes possible a new, highly advanced automatic white balance system. Canon 1.5-inch, 14.3 Megapixel High-Sensitivity CMOS Sensor The sensor for PowerShot G1 X digital camera is nearly the size of an EOS DSLR camera's APS-C sized sensor, and built with a similar pixel structure.

Noise is dramatically reduced at high ISO speeds for clear low-light and nighttime shooting. Resolution at low ISO speeds is incredibly rich and precise. And, most atypically for a compact camera, the PowerShot G1 X digital camera allows you to create the intensely beautiful background blur that is the hallmark of DSLR cameras. Canon HS SYSTEM The Canon HS SYSTEM lets you take bright, clear photos in an even wider range of shooting situations. Beautiful low-light shots are possible with minimal noise and maximum detail in highlight and shadow areas. The system is the result of two technologies brought together in PowerShot cameras: a high-sensitivity imaging sensor, which is able to capture more light; and the DIGIC Image Processor, which actively reduces noise with high-speed image processing.

Shooting and Recording Modes Including 14-bit RAW + JPEG The PowerShot G1 X offers a host of shooting and recording modes ranging from fully automatic to fully manual. The camera recognizes 32 shooting situations, automatically optimizing settings. 14-bit offers a 4x increase in RAW data, giving images rich detail in both highlights and shadows as well as smoother, more natural tonal gradation for outstanding image quality. Canon Full HD Video Advantage In addition to the HS SYSTEM, the combination of the advanced CMOS sensor and DIGIC 5 Image Processor in the PowerShot G1 X digital camera makes it possible to shoot crisp, clear high definition video. In addition to being able to shoot Full HD 1080p video at 24.

frames per second, the PowerShot G1 X digital camera can also shoot 720p HD video at 30. frames per second. Dedicated Movie Button, Wind filter feature and Optical Zoom for easy video capture The PowerShot G1 X has a dedicated movie button that lets you start and stop recording instantly. The PowerShot G1 X also incorporates an electronic wind filter, which suppresses wind noise that can muffle or distort the sound.

PowerShot G1 X also lets you use the full range of optical zoom when you're shooting a video. IFrame With the PowerShot G1 X, you can also shoot video in the Apple iFrame format. It keeps file sizes small, making it more convenient to upload or e-mail high-quality videos.

4x Wide-Angle Optical Zoom and 28mm Lens The PowerShot G1 X digital camera is equipped with a newly designed 4x Wide-Angle Optical Zoom and 28mm lens (35mm equivalent: 28-112mm). The f/2.8 lens captures a wealth of subtle detail and easily covers a full range of shooting situations. Optical Image Stabilizer and Intelligent IS Canon's Optical Image Stabilizer is a sophisticated system that shifts a lens group to correct unwanted camera movement. Intelligent IS analyzes camera movement and applies the best shake correction method for the shooting situation. 3.0-inch Vari-Angle PureColor System LCD The camera's 3.0-inch Vari-Angle LCD screen swivels out and rotates, tilting up and down to give you access to the highest and lowest angles. Type Compact digital still camera with built-in flash, 4x Optical, 4x Digital, and 16x Combined Zoom with Optical Image Stabilizer Image Capture Device Type 14.3 Megapixels, 1.5-inch CMOS Total Pixels Approx.

15.0 Megapixels Effective Pixels Approx. 14.3 Megapixels Lens Focal Length 15.1 (W) - 60.4mm (T) (35mm film equivalent: 28 (W) - 112mm (T) Optical Zoom 4x Digital Zoom 4x Focusing Range Normal: 1.3 ft. (40cm) - infinity (W), 4.3 ft. (1.3m) - infinity (T) Auto: 7.9 in.

(20cm) - infinity (W), 2.8 ft. (85cm) - infinity (T) Macro: 7.9 in. (20-70cm) (W), 2.8 ft. (85cm - 1.6m) (T) Autofocus System TTL Autofocus Viewfinders Optical Viewfinder Real-image zoom viewfinder LCD Monitor 3.0-inch TFT color LCD (Vari-angle type with wide-viewing angle) LCD Pixels Approx. 922,000 dots LCD Coverage Approx.

100% Aperture and Shutter Maximum Aperture f/2.8 (W) - f/5.8 (T) - The following f/numbers are available in Av or M: W: f/2.8, 3.2, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.6, 6.3, 7.1, 8.0, 9.0, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16 T: f/5.8, 6.3, 7.1, 8.0, 9.0, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16 - Differs depending on the zoom position Shutter Speed 1-1/4000 sec. 60-1/4000 sec.